Source: cnet.com
A rumor gets started about a Facebook privacy breach. It matters
little whether the story turns out to be true because we're hooked on
the stylized drama guaranteed to follow: Before long, all kinds of folks
are running around as if their hair's on fire, screaming about how Mark
Zuckerberg is a rat fink who betrayed his oath to protect their online
identities. Then old farts like me, who still remember what it was like
when our world was not an open book, chime in with thumb-suckers
decrying what's lost in our overshared, increasingly cyberconnected
lifestyle. Blah, blah, blah. Zzzzz.
OK, it's a complicated relationship -- and not just with Facebook but also other social networks. More about that in a moment.
The latest uproar started early Monday after French newspapers reported
that private Facebook messages had mysteriously popped up on user
Timelines. On this side of the pond, the rumor picked up speed
and it wasn't long before the general freak-out was underway. Turned
out it was another case of much ado about nothing. The problem had to to
do with the format of wall posts that read like direct messages as
Timeline now makes it easier to locate previous wall-to-wall
interactions.
But this was just one example of the weird
direction that discussions about user privacy and Facebook often take. I
don't feel sorry for Facebook, which has itself to blame for the lousy
reputation. After years taking a sometimes indifferent approach to user
privacy it shoulders the burden of proof. But concern is one thing,
paranoia's something else. Writing in PandoDaily, David Holmes
offered the spot-on observation that a fresh Facebook privacy scandal
seems to roll off the transom each week. Even when it's a faux scandal,
we're still left with the impression that somehow, Facebook screwed up
again.
Turn off, tune out, drop out?
Let's at least be honest with ourselves. Companies are collections of imperfect beings, and try as they might, they'll always disappoint when it comes to making good on privacy protection guarantees. When you decide to post information on Facebook, it's out there, for better or for worse. Sam Biddle of Gizmodo had it just right when he tweeted the other day about people's shortsightedness when it comes to privacy tolerance as "we're outraged by things we ourselves did."
Let's at least be honest with ourselves. Companies are collections of imperfect beings, and try as they might, they'll always disappoint when it comes to making good on privacy protection guarantees. When you decide to post information on Facebook, it's out there, for better or for worse. Sam Biddle of Gizmodo had it just right when he tweeted the other day about people's shortsightedness when it comes to privacy tolerance as "we're outraged by things we ourselves did."
At this stage in the info sharing revolution, I'm not
offering any revelation by noting there's always a risk that someone
other than your friends will be able to take a gander at your Facebook
posts -- either because of user error or due to a real privacy glitch.
For most of us, that's not a big deal. Some 900 million-plus people
continue to share messages and pictures because they get value out of
using a social network to keep up with family and friends. If the
minority out there still can't take the privacy jitters, my advice is to
delete your Facebook account and use the phone. In 1999, Sun CEO Scott
McNealy caught a lot of flak after declaring that "you have zero privacy
anyway. Get over it." He was blunt and he offended a lot of people, but
he was right.
No comments:
Post a Comment